Legal Opinion

Kacavisti v. Sprague Electric Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1959No. 4729PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The plaintiff contends that the defendants, who took no exceptions during the trial nor to the denial of their motion for a “directed verdict,” and who made no motion to set aside the decree, now have no right to appeal the decision of the Superior Court. Perreault v. Lyons, 98 N. H. 317. However, there are exceptions to this general rule, especially in cases tried before the court without a jury where a single issue is plainly raised. Eastman v. Waisman, 94 N. H. 253. In the present case, the record, including the defendants’ exceptions to the failure of the Court to grant their request for…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. McKeever Custom Cabinets v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. Shipman v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. City of Rochester v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API