Legal Opinion
AYR Composition, Inc. v. Rosenberg
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 8, 1993PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
261 N.J. Super. 495 (1993)
619 A.2d 592
AYR COMPOSITION, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRED ROSENBERG, TOM MARGUCCIO DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS CROSS-APPELLANTS, AND CHERENSON, CARROLL & HOLZER, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY TRADING UNDER THE FICTITIOUS NAME OF THE CHERENSON GROUP, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 8, 1992.
Decided January 8, 1993.
Before Judges DREIER and SKILLMAN.
Antonio Inacio argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Inacio, on the brief).
Dore R. Beinhaker argued the cause for respondents-cross-appellants (Gulkin & Beinhaker,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Francis v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- United Board & Carton Corp. v. BrittingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Auxton Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. ParkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lamorte Burns & Co., Inc. v. WaltersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- VFB LLC v. Campbell Soup Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Board of Trustees of Teamsters Local 863 Pension Fund v. Foodtown, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Bruce Kaye v. Alan P. Rosefielde (073353)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.