In Re Estate of Wise
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. Samuels, Oscar Samuels, and W. P. Netherton, for Appellant
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This is an appeal hy the mother of Kenneth Dare Wise from so much of an order of the superior court of Santa Cruz County as denies her petition for guardianship of the person and estate of said minor.
On September 27, 1916, Pearl Makinney, a grand-aunt of the said minor, petitioned for letters of guardianship of his person and estate. In said petition it was alleged that the boy, then about nine years of age, had been left by his grandfather, Dr. Kenneth Dare Wise, a legacy of the value of about ten thousand dollars, in trust, the income of which, and the principal if necessary, should be used…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of ForresterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Guardianship of SalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Guardianship v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- In re GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- In Re Estate of MorhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Guardianship of NewellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.