Guardianship of Smith
California Supreme Court
1DissentSchauer, J.
I dissent.
This is a judgment roll appeal. The facts are not in dispute. The trial court found “That both petitioner Frieda Howes. and counter petitioner Harry Cohen are fit and proper persons to be the guardian of the minors herein, and to have their . . . custody . . . That it is to the best interest and welfare of said minor children that Frieda Howes be ap*99pointed guardian of their persons ...” The court also found that the mother of said children is deceased and that “Petitioner [adult sister of the minors] has supported and cared for said minors since the death of the mother” and that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roche v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Campbell v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Guardianship of KenteraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.