Dawn M. Clary v. Tristar Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAWN M. CLARY, Plaintiff, 4:22CV3230 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Tristar Products, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Filing No. 75) and Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Dr. John Pratt (Filing No. 78). For the reasons stated below, both motions are denied. STATEMENT OF FACTS On July 17, 2020, Plaintiff Dawn M. Clary was using a Power Quick Pot model Y6D-36 pressure cooker (the “pressure cooker”), marketed and distributed by Defendant Tristar…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.