Legal Opinion
Specter Petition
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Decided August 25, 1969No. 854PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLOANE, J.,
Generally, the query to me directs itself to the right of a witness to have a transcript of the testimony he gave to the investigating grand jury.
Particularly, before me also, are two separate motions, by two separate lawyers for two sets of separate witnesses, for a transcript of the prior testimony of each such witness to be given to his lawyer and each such witness, for study and perusal (not with haste) before any of them may be called back to the investigating grand jury for further or additional testimony.
On Monday last, (l).such motion by one lawyer on behalf of one witness…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Pennsylvania v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Columbia Investment Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. Columbia Investment Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972