Commonwealth v. Columbia Investment Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Montgomery, J.:
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s action in affirming the quashing of the indictments in this case.
The lower court, speaking through Hon. Theodore B. Smith, Jr., Judge, in an exhaustive opinion gave four reasons for its action in quashing the indictments, i.e., (1) the failure of the Commonwealth to have the defendants previously arrested and given a preliminary hearing before their indictment; (2) the denial to defendants of their Sixth Amendment rights to the assistance of counsel; (3) in compelling the individual defendants to appear and testify…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KilgallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.