Legal Opinion
Cinel v. Barna
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 2012No. B232380PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Defendant George Bama appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to compel arbitration. Previously, in Cinel v. Christopher (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 759 [136 Cal.Rptr.3d 763], we affirmed the trial *1386court’s order refusing to confirm as an “award” the arbitrator’s termination of the action for nonpayment of fees of several of the defendants. Bama returned to the trial court to compel arbitration, arguing he had paid his fees. On appeal, Bama argues the trial court erred because it had already determined a valid arbitration agreement existed, and he has not waived or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lifescan, Inc. v. Premier Diabetic Services, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Victoria v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Todd Sink v. Aden Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation and Michael LutherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'Donoghue v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Belyea v. GreenSky, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Brelsford v. YourMechanic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Ding, Ph.D. v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Fraser v. RV Country, Inc. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.