Legal Opinion
Todd Sink v. Aden Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation and Michael Luther
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 2003No. 02-35323PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires a district court to stay an action and order arbitration when the party seeking to compel arbitration has previously defaulted in proceeding with ar- . bitration.
I
On May 25, 2000, appellee Todd Sink (“Sink”) sued appellants Aden Enterprises and Michael Luther (collectively, “Aden”) in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, alleging that Aden breached Sink’s employment agreement by not providing payments and stock options due Sink. Because of an arbitration clause in Sink’s employment agreement,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Richard Scott Bushley v. Credit Suisse First Boston, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Schoenduve Corporation, a California Corporation v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.