Legal Opinion

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 25, 2003No. SC02-1680PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

863 So.2d 201 (2003)

Naji NEHME, etc., Petitioner,

v.

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. SC02-1680.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 25, 2003.

Earl Denney of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL; and Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner.

Mercer K. Clarke and Spencer T. Kuvin of Clarke, Silvergate, Williams & Montgomery, Miami, FL; Andrew T. Bayman of King & Spalding, Atlanta, Georgia; Jennings L. Hurt, III, John P. Daly, and Karissa O. McAloon of Rissman,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Kush v. LloydSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. L.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Nancy Carola Jacobsen v. Florida Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Elaine Hess, etc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
  3. Barco v. School Bd. of Pinellas CountySupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Cason v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF MANAGEMENT SERVS.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Zold v. ZoldSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API