Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1990No. 56973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of second degree robbery, § 569.030, RSMo 1986; the court sentenced him in accordance with the jury’s assessment to five years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

In his sole point on appeal defendant contends that

[t]he trial court erred by overruling [his] motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the entire case because the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction for robbery in the second degree in that [defendant] did not use or threaten the use of physical force.

The standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. MaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. State v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. DuggarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State of Missouri v. Claude Dale BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. TalkingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State of Missouri v. Gary Leland ColemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API