Legal Opinion

Stark v. Chock Full O'Nuts

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 1, 1974PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action based upon negligence and breach of warranty of fitness, the plaintiff testified that her tooth was injured when she bit into a ‘ ‘ nutted cheese ’ ’ sandwich that contained a large, hard walnut shell, which shell was immediately turned over to defendant. Upon appeal, the defendant only raises two issues. First of all, an issue is raised as to whether the complaint should have been dismissed on the ground that the piece of walnut shell did not render the sandwich unfit for human consumption. Secondly, a question is presented as to whether the trial court erred in directing a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Mercatante v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. O'Hare v. PetersenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1940
  5. Varone v. CalarcoNew York Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mexicali Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Phillips v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Yong Cha Hong v. Marriott Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  4. Solow v. WellnerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1991
  5. Vamos v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API