Legal Opinion

Seiterle v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1962No. L. A. 26574Published

1Opinion of the Court

57 Cal.2d 397 (1962)

DAVID JACOB SEITERLE, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent.

L. A. No. 26574.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 15, 1962.

Earl Klein for Petitioner.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Attorney General, William O. Mackey, District Attorney, and Roland Wilson, Chief Trial Attorney, for Respondent.

DOOLING, J.

The object of this proceeding is to prevent the respondent court from retrying the issue of penalty on two murder counts and so subjecting petitioner to "double prosecution…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API