Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Sher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1930No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

The court below struck off a judgment entered by confession and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff leased to defendant a certain piece of real estate in the City of Scranton. . The lease, after describing the demised premises, states that there is included therein an “addition which at the signing of this agreement is under construction, and the completion of which addition is to be made as soon as possible.” The term is stated thus: “For the term to be as specified ......at the rent as specified on other side of this agreement.” An endorsement appears on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitney v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Meyers & Joly v. FreilingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Connay v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  4. Oberlin v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Orner v. HurwitchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Lenson v. SandlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Drey St. M. Co. for Use v. NevlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Sterling Electrical & Furniture Co. v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API