Legal Opinion

State v. Mendez

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 9, 2014No. 2013AP1862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. Ivan Mendez seeks to withdraw his guilty plea to the charge of maintaining a drug trafficking place in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.42(1) (2011-12).1 At the time of his plea, Mendez's attorney failed to inform him that conviction of this charge would subject him to automatic deportation from the United States with no applicable exception and no possibility of discretionary waiver. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (2) (A) (i) (II) (2006); see also Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 363 (2010) (explaining that in 1996 Congress eliminated discretionary relief from deportation and that for controlled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. OrocioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Ramani Pilla v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Hatem M. ShataWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Hatem M. ShataWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Hatem M. ShataWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API