Legal Opinion

Smith v. Louisville N. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 6, 1929No. 6 Div. 455PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

At the outset, we are invited to a consideration of the sufficiency of the contributory negligence pleas as answers to the simple negligence count of the complaint. For convenience we will restate some of the principles of the law of pleading which seem to have application. Such plea is not sufficient without stating the facts constituting the contributory negligence relied on. Dwight Mfg. Co. v. Holmes, 198 Ala. 590, 73 So. 933, citing a large number of our cases to the same effect. Where the facts alleged import contributory negligence per se, it is not necessary expressly to characterize…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Watts v. Montgomery Traction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Dwight Manufacturing Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Brown v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Townsend v. AdairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Kendrick v. BIRMINGHNA SOUTHERN R. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API