Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Means

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 12, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELAHANTY, Justice.

Seeking to enforce the terms of a guarantee agreement, the plaintiffs, co-trustees of the Rosenthal Family Trust (co-trustees), brought this suit against the defendants, guarantors. From an order of the Kenne-bec County Superior Court granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs for $47,-702.37, as mortgage payments and costs of the foreclosure proceeding, and $3,000.00, as reasonable attorney’s fees, the defendants have appealed. We deny the appeal.

The facts underlying the rather complicated financial transaction involved in the instant lawsuit are not in dispute. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roger M. Gordon v. Vincent Youmans, Inc. And Miller Music CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. Clark v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kandlis v. HuotariSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Hilltop Community Sports Center, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Depositors Trust Co. v. Hudson General Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  4. Bumila v. Keiser Homes of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. Summa Humma Enterp. v. Fisher EngineeringDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API