Legal Opinion
Murdick v. Georgelas & Sons, Inc.
Loudoun County Circuit Court
Decided January 17, 1992No. Case No. (Law) 9283Published
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge Thomas D. Horne
This case was tried before a jury on November 15,1991. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant bank. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed a Motion for a New Trial in which he asserts error by the court and requests a new trial.
Plaintiffs herein seek to recover against the defendant bank upon a certain letter of credit dated February 12,1986. This letter is identified in the record as plaintiffs’ Exhibit No. 1. A separate settlement was reached with the defendant, Georgelas & Sons, Inc. Accordingly, the matter was not tried as to it.
The letter of credit was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corporation, a Louisiana Corporation v. Southern National Bank of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, a National Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Schickling v. AspinallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. SrokaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Consolidated Sales Co. v. Bank of Hampton RoadsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Kollaer v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.