Verdery v. Withers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In support of the general demurrer the able and learned counsel for the plaintiff in error make two main arguments: first, that the alleged contract was void because of the indefiniteness of the description of the plaintiff’s lands; and second, that a proper construction of the correspondence between the parties shows conclusively that the defendant was not bound to buy the propert3r unless a plat was submitted that was satisfactory to him, and that no such plat was furnished. We will discuss these contentions in the order named.
The law does not favor the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Flannery & Co. v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- McAfee v. ArlineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Leffler Co. v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Boyd v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Greenwald v. KershCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Pierson v. General Plywood Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. Ra-Lin & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Indian Trail Village, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.