Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
A reargument of this appeal became necessary because of the objection taken by the appellant to one of the justices taking part in the decision, who had been corporation counsel, and as such, attorney for the city, during the time this proceeding was pending in the courts.
In 1916 the board of estimate and apportionment, pursuant to the Greater New York Charter, decided it was for the public interest that the title to certain real property be acquired for the opening and extending of Inwood Hill Park, in the city of New York, as laid out on the city map in accordance with a resolution which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Langdon v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Sage v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Lansing v. SmithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Long Sault Development Co. v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Little Falls v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- State v. Trustees of the Freeholders & CommonaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984