Legal Opinion

Farris v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 20, 1976No. C 75-0404-L(B)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRATCHER, Chief Judge.

This matter comes on before the Court on motion by defendants, Sears, Roebuck & Company and Globe Union, Inc., to dismiss this action as to intervening plaintiffs, Ralph L. Barnes and Sebert Barnes, on the grounds that their causes are barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations, KRS 413.-140(l)(c).

In order to comply with the terms of the Statute, an action for malicious prosecution must be “commenced” within one year. The underlying action, which allegedly constituted the malicious prosecution complained of, was dismissed by the U. S. District…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conder v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Jack v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Keller Bros. Securities Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. BTA Oil Producers v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Korwek v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API