Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Lyles

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1982No. 1797Published

1DissentWieand, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The instant appeal is properly before this court, and I would decide it on its merits.

The appeal has been filed from an order modifying a sentence entered in a criminal case. Appellate jurisdiction in such cases has been vested in the Superior Court. See: Commonwealth v. Bender, 251 Pa.Super. 454, 380 A.2d 868 (1977); Goldsborough v. Burk, 4 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 513, 288 A.2d 555 (1972); 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 742, 762. Cf. Commonwealth v. Sensi, 287 Pa.Super. 452, 430 A.2d 691 (1981).

Moreover, even if there were a jurisdictional defect, neither party has raised the issue; and,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jost v. Phoenixville Area School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. BenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. GuintherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. SensiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Schrecengost v. Armstrong School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API