Legal Opinion

Jost v. Phoenixville Area School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1979No. 2261PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order refusing to grant a new trial. Appellant asserts that appellee is not entitled to the damages awarded him by the jury.

Appellee started the action on June 21, 1972, by filing a praecipe for writ of summons. On July 7 appellant entered its appearance, and on October 10 appellee filed a complaint in assumpsit, which may be summarized as follows.

During the 1958-59 school year appellee was employed by East Pikeland Township School District as a teacher under a professional employee contract. His employment continued through the 1965-66 school year, at…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Darby School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Fleck v. McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. Oxford Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Tassone v. Redstone Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Robinson v. Abington Education Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Neshaminy Federation of Teachers v. Neshaminy School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. School District of Philadelphia v. TwerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Schultz v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Oswald v. HausmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Martino v. Transport Workers Union Local 234Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API