Legal Opinion

Local 204 of Textile Workers Union of A. v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 7, 1943No. 7 Div. 713PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

If a motion for new trial has been duly filed, considered and overruled, the time limited for taking an appeal from the original judgment dates from the judgment overruling the motion for new trial; and this regardless of whether the fact of a motion for new trial and ruling thereon appear in the bill of exceptions so as to warrant a review of the ruling on the motion under Tit. 7, § 764 of the Code. Richards v. Williams, 231 Ala. 450, 165 So. 820; Emerson v. State, 241 Ala. 383, 4 So.2d 186.

What we have written sufficiently discloses the holding of the opinion in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. CockrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. T. R. Miller Mill Co. v. RallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Ex Parte Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Franklin v. CannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Meeks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API