Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Rouse's Supermarket

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1995No. 94 CA 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JjFOGG, Judge.

Plaintiff, Richmond Boyd, Jr., appeals the Office of Worker’s Compensation (OWC) hearing officer’s judgment finding that his employer, Rouse’s Supermarket, and its worker’s compensation insurer, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York (collectively “Rouse’s”), are entitled to a set-off against weekly indemnity benefits, pursuant to LSA-R.S. 23:1225, for Social Security disability benefits received by Boyd.

On September 14, 1989, Boyd was injured when he slipped and fell while walking out of the freezing unit at the Rouse’s Supermarket where he was employed as a frozen food…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. International Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Town of Berwick v. JustilianLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. City of Pineville v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. Rouse's SupermarketLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API