Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Rouse's Supermarket
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1996No. 96 CA 0174PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
I2FOGG, Judge.
By this appeal, a workers’ compensation claimant contests the hearing officer’s computation of the reverse offset provided for by LSA-R.S. 23:1225. For the following reasons, we affirm.
On September 14, 1989, Richmond Boyd, Jr. was injured while in the course and scope *1339of his employment with Rouse’s Supermarket. At the time of the accident, Boyd’s average weekly wage was $300.00. On the date of the accident, Rouse’s Supermarket began paying bi-weekly workers’ compensation benefits at the weekly rate of $240.08.
After the accident, Boyd applied for and was awarded disability…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Fontenot v. Trans Gulf, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Grant v. Federal Land BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hilliard v. ShuffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Al Johnson Construction v. PitreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998