Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ponder

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1984No. 167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Anthony Ponder was tried non-jury and was found guilty of robbery, conspiracy and related offenses arising from a theft committed at knifepoint in the City of Philadelphia. The trial judge thereafter sustained a motion in arrest of judgment and ordered Ponder’s discharge. On appeal to this Court, the order arresting judgment was reversed; and the case was remanded for consideration of an undetermined motion for new trial. See: Commonwealth v. Ponder, 260 Pa.Super. 225, 393 A.2d 1235 (1978). The trial judge, on remand, ordered a new trial; and the case was *569subsequently assigned…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. PittmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. MaddoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. EasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API