Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1982No. 74 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1982PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

The Commonwealth seeks allowance of appeal from an order of the Superior Court granting respondent a new trial on burglary, robbery, kidnapping, and related charges. Respondent was found guilty of the charges by a court sitting without a jury. The Superior Court granted relief on the ground that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to object to a defective jury-trial-waiver colloquy.

Our Rules of Criminal Procedure require a trial judge to ascertain whether a defendant’s waiver of the right to trial by jury “is a knowing and intelligent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. RiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. MorinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MallorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. MichaudSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API