Legal Opinion

State v. A. M.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 23, 2016No. SC 19497PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant began dating the victim's mother in 2003 and moved in with the mother and her three children later that same year. In August, 2009, the victim, who was approximately ten years old at the time, told her mother's cousin that the defendant had squeezed her buttocks while she was washing dishes. The cousin alerted the victim's mother who then removed the defendant from the home. Approximately two weeks later, the victim's mother allowed the defendant back into the home. She did not call the police or alert the victim's father…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Patrick M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  4. Gomez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  5. State v. CarlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API