Legal Opinion
Osterling v. Rose
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1926No. Appeal, 138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
In 1913, the plaintiff, F. J. Osterling, of Pittsburgh, brought suit against Luzerne County to recover for his services as architect of the new courthouse in that county. The case was transferred to Lackawanna County, where the law firm of O’Brien & Kelly appeared for the plaintiff, but for some reason it was not promptly brought to trial and in 1920 Osterling employed the Pittsburgh law firm of Watson & Freeman to take charge of the case. The total amount claimed by plain tiff approximated $175,000, and he seems to have agreed to pay the last-named attorneys a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Balogh v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Murphy's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Martin's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Bredin v. KinglandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Wills v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Rippey v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Testerman v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Michener v. Brady (In Re Brady)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999