Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Sands

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1953No. 35363Published

1Opinion of the Court

265 P.2d 1097 (1953)

IRWIN

v.

SANDS.

No. 35363.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 22, 1953.

Jesse J. Worton, Jr., Pawhuska, Henry C. Rohr, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.

Chas. R. Gray and W.N. Palmer, Pawhuska, for defendant in error.

2Per curiam

The parties to this appeal will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court: A.S. Sands was the plaintiff, Sylvia Rogers Irwin and Raymond C. Irwin, her husband, were defendants. Since Raymond C. Irwin was only a nominal defendant and all the controversy really only affected Sylvia Rogers Irwin, she will be referred to as defendant in the singular.

Pl…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Echols v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. First National Bank of Tulsa v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Jackson v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Vose v. U.S. Cities CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API