Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1932No. 9216PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANT, District Judge.
The parties here will be referred to as in the trial court, wherein Union Electric Light & Power Company was plaintiff, and Natalie Wilson, and others, were defendants. Said plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Missouri. Under the laws of the United States hereinafter referred to, and by virtue of a license thereunder, issued by the proper authorities, said plaintiff has been clothed with the right to institute the proceeding in condemnation here involved. Such proceeding- was instituted in the court below, and was so far…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In the Matter, Etc., Village of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Tonnele v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Tremayne v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Kile v. Town of YellowheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Test v. LarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Livesay Industries, Inc. v. Livesay Window Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC v. Marseilles Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Kathleen Denise Shirley v. Maxicare Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Leopard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Burgess v. NailCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.