Legal Opinion

Wittenberg University v. Waterworth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1984No. C-830493PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The single assignment of error 1 presents the question whether under the will of Katherine E. Hohmann (“testatrix”), those parts of her residuary-estate that she bequeathed to charitable institutions should be reduced by proportionate amounts of the federal and state estate taxes (referred to jointly as “death taxes”) payable by her estate, thus shifting the entire burden of death taxes to the remaining parts of the residuary estate bequeathed to individual beneficiaries. The probate judge held that the will expressed testatrix’s intention that the charitable parts should not be so reduced,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In Re Estate of Herbert R. Penney, Deceased. Milton H. Penney v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Hans W. Vahlteich v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. The Fifth Third Bank v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Varns v. VarnsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Estate of Vahlteich v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  5. Gallagher v. Estate of StepfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API