Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1998No. 97CA0210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a trial court may apportion settlement proceeds paid by a third-party tortfeasor among a workers’ compensation claimant, the claimant’s spouse, and the employer’s insurer. We conclude that it may and, therefore, reverse the trial court order determining, without a hearing, that the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (CCIA) is entitled to offset any future obligation it may have for workers’ compensation medical benefits to the extent of the net proceeds plaintiffs, James T. Jorgensen (claimant) and his wife, Doreen H.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tate v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Mastin v. Liberal MarketsKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Martinez v. St. Joseph Hospital & Nursing Home of Del Norte, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Rains v. Kolberg Manufacturing Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Tucker v. Clare Bros. Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Pinnacol AssuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Harrison v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. AVIADO v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. City of Lakewood v. Safety National Casualty Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API