Legal Opinion

Marcoux v. Prim

North Carolina Business Court

Decided April 16, 2004No. 04-CVS-920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marcoux v. Prim,

2004 NCBC 5

NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF FORSYTH 04 CVS 920 RICHARD MARCOUX, on behalf of ) himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER AND OPINION ) BILLY D. PRIM, ANDREW J. ) FILIPOWSKI, MARK CASTANEDA, ) DAVID L. WARNOCK, RICHARD A. ) BRENNER, STEVEN D. DEVICK, ) ROBERT J. LUNN and JOHN H. ) MUEHLSTEIN, ) ) Defendants. ) {1} This case arises out of Plaintiff Richard Marcoux’s (“Marcoux”) claim that Defendants Billy D. Prim, Andrew J. Filipowski, Mark Castaneda, David L. Warnock, Richard A.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Teague v. Bayer AG Bayer Polymers, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. ESTATE OF BROWNE v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Ehrenhaus v. BakerNorth Carolina Business Court · 2008
  4. Ehrenhaus v. BakerNorth Carolina Business Court · 2008
  5. Investors Corp. of Vt. v. Bayer AGVermont Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API