Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff was the owner of land adjoining the right of way of defendant, and had planted trees upon the land within his inclosure, and very near to the fence which is claimed by him to mark the line. It is claimed by the defendant that as a' matter of fact the railroad company’s right of way included the lands upon which the trees were grown. It would appear, however, that the plaintiff had fenced in all the lands within his present inclosure many years ago, and it is probable that he has acquired title by adverse possession. However this may be, it appears to us that the case was tried…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Abbinett v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Smith v. HoltSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  4. Cannon v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API