Gilcrease v. Gilcrease
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentGibson, J.
Admittedly here the award to the wife was not in any sense a settlement of property rights, and the divorce decree was granted the husband because of the fault of the wife. I agree that the exact question has not been presented heretofore, and for that reason, among others, I fail to see that the case of Flaxman v. Flaxman, 177 Okla. 28, 57 P. 2d 819, furnishes a rule by which the question should be decided. In fact the Flaxman Case, in discussing the former opinion in the same case, states:
“In other words, we extended a rule arising from the particular wording of our alimony statute, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Bussey v. BusseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Newberry v. NewberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.