Legal Opinion

Maia v. Security Lumber & Concrete Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1958No. Civ. 9188PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff as the result of the alleged negligence of defendant. The order denying his motion for a new trial, not being appealable, Ms purported appeal therefrom must be dismissed.

The defendant corporation had experienced mechanical difficulties in the operation of a conveyor belt at its cement mixing plant in Vallejo, and its president, David Paganini, communicated with the Yuba Manufacturing Company concerning the matter. Yuba, who was plaintiff’s employer, suggested that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Petersen v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Pauly v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Kuntz v. Del E. Webb Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Alber v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API