Legal Opinion

Carpenter, Babson & Fendler v. Condor Pictures, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1940No. 9329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Claims for attorneys’ fees were disallowed by the court below, and the claimants appealed pursuant to § 250 of the Chandler Act, Act of June 22, 1938, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650.

On November 23, 1937, an involuntary petition for the adjudication of Condor Pictures, Inc., hereafter called the debtor, was filed. The debtor’s directors adopted a resolution employing Carpenter, Babson and Fendler, hereafter called the firm, as attorneys for it at a compensation to be fixed by the court. The firm filed for the debtor an answer to the petition and a motion to dismiss. Certain creditors…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dee v. United Exchange Bldg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Carpenter v. Condor Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forbes v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Ziegler v. Condor Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API