Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Arnovits

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 18, 1953No. 1434Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLatimer, Judge

I concur in that portion of the Court’s opinion which deals with the failure of the law officer to give an instruction on knowledge as one of the elements of failure to obey a lawful regulation in violation of Article 92.

However, for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in United States v. Gibson, 3 USCMA 612, 13 CMR 68, I dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority, namely, that the prejudice necessarily resulting from the law officer’s failure to -instruct on the lesser included offenses was purged by the action of the court-martial in finding on the lesser offenses, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. McElroyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API