United States v. Arnovits
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLatimer, Judge
I concur in that portion of the Court’s opinion which deals with the failure of the law officer to give an instruction on knowledge as one of the elements of failure to obey a lawful regulation in violation of Article 92.
However, for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in United States v. Gibson, 3 USCMA 612, 13 CMR 68, I dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority, namely, that the prejudice necessarily resulting from the law officer’s failure to -instruct on the lesser included offenses was purged by the action of the court-martial in finding on the lesser offenses, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. McElroyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953