In RE DOLE FOOD CO., INC. STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION. in Re Appraisal of Dole Food Company, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LASTER, Vice Chancellor.
The defendants designated a corporation to serve as their expert witness. The plaintiffs objected, arguing that an expert witness must be a biological person. According to the plaintiffs, the distinction matters because a corporate expert witness could claim to rely on the collective knowledge and experience of all of its employees and agents, while a biological person only can rely on the more limited knowledge and experience that a living mind might accumulate.
This decision holds that an expert witness must be a biological person. The defendants therefore…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Trustees of Dartmouth College v. WoodwardSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- 77 Charters, Inc. v. Jonathan D. Gould (Stonemar Cookeville Partners, LLC and Cookeville Retail Holdings, LLC, Nominal Defendants)Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- ADT Holdings, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
- Altigen Communications, Inc. v. DayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
- Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. v. Recleim LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Ashish Chordia v. Edward LeeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.