Miller v. Grunsky
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion
This action was to quiet title to a strip of land in the county of Merced. The strip of land in dispute was the west thirteen and a half chains of sections 30 and 31 in a certain township. The land was swamp and overflowed land, and title thereto was vested in the state under the Swamp Land Act. Plaintiff claimed title under a patent issued to him by the state in December, 1873, while defendant's claim is based upon a certificate of purchase dated in 1887. Plaintiff's patent was for 1878 acres, described by courses and distances. After carrying the boundary to a certain point, the next and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Moore v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Chipley v. FarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.