Legal Opinion

People v. Mendenhall

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1901No. Cr. No. 658Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; F. H. Dunne, Judge. William P. Mendenhall was convicted of assault with intent to murder and appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The defendant was charged with and convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit murder, and appeals from the judgment given against him. The court instructed the jury as follows: “Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Such *632malice may be express or implied. It is express when there is manifested a deliberate intention unlawfully to take away the life' of a fellow-creature. It is implied when no deliberate provocation appears, or when the circumstances attending the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart. ’ ’ It is insisted that this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. BurgleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API