Legal Opinion

Beha v. Berger

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The above case together with thirty-eight others have been divided into four groups and each group has been tried separately. The object of these actions is to recover from policyholders of the National Automobile Mutual Casualty Company, now in liquidation, assessments made by the liquidator, pursuant to the Insurance Law.

At the opening of the trials, motions were made by the defend*236ants to dismiss all the complaints on the ground that they did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. These motions were properly made at the trials. (Klippel v. Weil, 204 App. Div. 323.)

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klippel v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waynesville Security Bank v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Nichols v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Morey v. Educator & Executive Insurers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. B & E Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API