Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Burks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1971No. 33704PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

This appeal grows out of proceedings by which the City of St. Louis condemned plaintiff’s dilapidated, vandalized building. The threshold question here is whether the plaintiff effectively appealed to the City’s appellate tribunal when he “paid” the required filing fee with a worthless check.

Plaintiff Johnson owns real estate in St. Louis. Defendants Burks, Beins and Murphy are members of St. Louis City’s Board of Buildings Appeals, defendant Miller is the Board’s Secretary, and defendant Brown is the City’s Building Commissioner. Plaintiff petitioned the Circuit Court…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Komosa v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Conservative Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WarneckeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Kattering v. FranzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Gill v. Mercantile Trust CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Manchester Bank West County v. EnrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Buckhorn Rubber Products, Inc. v. RobisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Klosterman v. Estate of LanningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API