Legal Opinion

Gill v. Mercantile Trust Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1961No. 30587PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Judge.

This comes to the writer upon reassignment. It is an action predicated upon the theory that there was a wrongful conversion of plaintiff’s automobile by the defendant corporation. The trial was to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $300 actual damages and $5,000 punitive damages. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was sustained, and the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The petition alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of an automobile and that the defendant’s agents illegally and wrongfully converted the automobile to the defendant’s use, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Interstate Airmotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Komosa v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Waggoner Bank & Trust Co. v. Gamer Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hickerson v. Con Frazier Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. GFC CORPORATION v. NesserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bartleman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Raffa v. Dania BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Emily v. BayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Marine Midland Bank-Central v. CoteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Nichols v. Tower Grove BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API