Legal Opinion · Dissent

Old Pueblo Transit Co. v. Corporation Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1951No. 5486Published

1DissentDe Concini, Justice

I agree with the proposition that if the 30-day statute, section 69-249, supra, applies, then appellant is too late with his notice of appeal. However it is probable that the portion of section 69-249 relating to the 30-day period has been impliedly repealed by section 21-1801, supra, Rules of Civil Procedure, No. 72, which allows 60 days in which to appeal. On that basis I dissent.

It is to be noted that the appellant filed its notice of appeal within 60 days of November 24th, the date on which its attorney actually received notice. Actual notice is sufficient notice. It is further to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. United States v. Certain Lands in Town of HighlandsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API