Legal Opinion

Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper v. Keystone Protein Company

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01307Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LOWER SUSQUEHANNA : Civil No. 1:19-cv-01307 RIVERKEEPER and the LOWER : SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER : ASSOCIATION, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : KEYSTONE PROTEIN COMPANY, : : Defendant. : J u d g e J e n n i f e r P . W i l s on MEMORANDUM This is a citizen suit under the Clean Water Act, which is the United States’ primary federal law governing water pollution. Before the court are cross motions: Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, Doc. 32, and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Doc. 35. For the reasons…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API