State Commission for Human Rights v. Perkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The first decretal paragraph of the order is stricken as academic in view of the representation by the commission that the superintendent of the building has left the employ of the respondents and ■the further fact that this decretal paragraph is in any event entirely too sweeping. (See Matter of Kindt v. State Comm. for Human Rights, 44 Misc *9152d 896, mod. on other grounds 23 A D 2d 809, affd. 16 N Y 2d 1001.) Given the presumption of constitutionality (see Commission Human Rights v. Kennelly, 30 A D 2d 310, 315; and compare Labor Law, § 706, subd. 3, also New York State Labor Relations Bd. v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kindt v. State Commission for Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- New York State Labor Relations Board v. Westchester Movers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sleigh v. ARC XVI Inwood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005