Legal Opinion
Farren v. Farren
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 23, 2013No. AC 33996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendant, J. Michael Farren, appeals from the trial court’s rulings on various post-judgment motions. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) abused its discretion in denying his motion to open and correct the judgment, (2) improperly denied his motion to determine the date of the filing of his motion to open and correct the judgment, and (3) *147improperly denied his motion for an expedited order with respect to the distribution of benefits held in his supplemental executive retirement plan. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Van Mecklenburg v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Osborne v. OsborneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Urban Redevelopment Commission v. KatsetosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cimino v. CiminoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Reiner v. ReinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Jonas v. Playhouse Square Condominium Assn., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Parnoff v. YuilleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016